How popular history distorts Churchill’s “never give up” speech

How popular history distorts Churchill’s “never give up” speech

He didn?t say or mean it that way

Image for postPhoto: Cecil Beaton [Public domain] at Wikimedia Commons

You probably heard about the famously short commencement speech supposedly given by Winston Churchill, in which he said:

?Never give up, never give up, never give up.?

According to the story, the courageous, eccentric, cigar-chomping British prime minister ? the man who had the guts to stare down Hitler and save the world from Nazi domination ? uttered these words, lowered his heavy frame and sat down, speech completed.

Image for postNice mug. Many more to choose from. Too bad he never said it.

The general public perceives it as one of the most concise and memorable speeches in history. It has become an inspirational rallying cry ? along with Vince Lombardi?s ?winners never quit? slogan (which, as I show in this story, is false because Lombardi himself quit several times).

Lombardi: a Winner who Quit

Winning isn?t everything

The point people like to make quoting Churchill and Lombardi is to never give up under any circumstances, no matter the pain, cost, self-sacrifice and suffering. To which history says: Baloney!

The Churchill ?never give up? quote as used by most is inaccurate because it doesn?t consider the context in the rest of Winston?s famous speech providing darn good reasons, even obligations, to give up.

This happens all the time in history. When a quote from someone famous is repeated often enough we eventually accept it as accurate, especially if the quote conforms with our modern-day image of who that person was and what he or she believed.

People, however, are complex and conflicted, and so is history.

In this article, I attempt to show how the popular history of Churchill?s speech to his alma matter, the all-boys Harrow School, on October 29, 1941, has been distorted.

Four inaccuracies on the popular history

It?s amazing what you can learn on this contraption called Google these days. A couple of hours of clicking around showed me that the Churchill story as commonly told and interpreted is inaccurate because:

  • Churchill?s address took about 20 minutes to deliver, not moments as many versions of the story claim.
  • He never said ?never give up.? He did say ?never give in.?
  • He did not intend his admonition to be a timeless universal principle but a lesson for ?himself? from a particular place and time, what he called ?this period of 10 months.?
  • The way Churchill framed the speech, his ?never give in? advice has exceptions as wide as his famous girth.

Key passage

Below is the key passage of the speech, taken from a transcript at The National Churchill Museum:

But for everyone, surely, what we have gone through in this period ? I am addressing myself to the School ? surely from this period of ten months this is the lesson: never give in, never give in, never, never, never, never-in nothing, great or small, large or petty ? never give in except to convictions of honour and good sense.

Image for postLearn more history about Churchill at the National Churchill Museum at Westminster College in Fulton, Missouri.

Winston?s two reasons to give in

Churchill provided huge loopholes to his general rule to ?never give? in when he says ?except to convictions of honor and good sense.?

In other words, consider quitting when:

  1. The endeavor violates your convictions of honor. What is honor? Adherence to what you believe is right.
  2. Walking away makes good sense. Here in the United States, we used to call that ?common sense.?

Application to your life and mine?

When you are in the middle of a pressure-packed situation as England was in World War II ? it?s easy to get disoriented in ?the fog of war.? Your emotions may tell you to give up and give in. But you can?t trust your emotions.

The best example from my life is when I was fired at age 50 in the middle of a Recession.

I got Fired at age 50

I thought my career was over

My back was against the wall, just like England?s. Recovery appeared unlikely.

Would Winston?s loopholes apply to me?

  1. Would persevering violate my ?convictions of honor?? On the contrary. The noble choice was to press on.
  2. Would walking away from my career aspirations and responsibility to provide for my family make ?good sense?? Absolutely not.

Allies came to the rescue to bolster my strength and fortitude. Yes, I got fired at 50, and that was humiliating. I also got fired UP after 50, which has been inspiring and rejuvenating.

It?s unclear if Churchill?s ?never given in? admonition was intended to be an ideal for all people for the rest of time or a pep talk to a school at a particularly perilous time in that nation?s history.

Here?s my personal takeaway: Like Churchill in World War II, acting courageously with stubborn perseverance can inspire others to victory and become your legacy ? if you ?never give in.?

Shameless plug: If you liked this article?s practical application of history to your life, you are going to love my eBook showing how four heroes of history turned their crisis into an opportunity ? and how you can do the same thing by applying their proven principles.

It?s free to those who subscribe to my monthly newsletter, Fired UP After 50, full of practical tips to help men over 50 take charge of their futures.

Image for post


No Responses

Write a response