Paypal Donations

Enter Amount:

What\'s Income?

The famous words of Benjamin Franklin, from a letter written in 1789:  "In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes."  More popularly phrased: "There's nothing certain but death and taxes!"

Well, guess what, folks, someone's wrong.  Is it the "tax honesty" community, also called "tax protestors," who remain firm in the belief that income tax is unlawful, and that there is in fact NO LAW that says we have to pay income tax?  Aaron Russo created quite a bang with this concept in his much-circulated film "America: From Freedom to Fascism," as did Ed and Elaine Brown in their famous 2007 IRS standdown.  "Show me the law," Ed Brown told the court as he and his wife were charged with hundreds of thousands of dollars owed in back taxes.  The story of the Browns ended in tragedy, with both convicted for tax evasion.  Yet it might have ended differently ... and perhaps it still can.

Enter a few very simple concepts, all securely rooted in statutory law.  The issue is not one of income tax being unlawful, but of what legally qualifies as "income."  Each year, millions of Americans report their earnings to the IRS, yielding a significant portion of this money to the government.  An entire industry of paid professionals has sprung up to help in the calculations of these contributions.  The onset of April 15th brings with it headaches, resentment and fear.  Some defy the tradition altogether by refusing to file the notorious 1040 U.S. Individual Return.

In fact, the 1040 form is considered your own legal testimony about whether or not you were involved in taxable activities for a particular year.  Here's what happens:  Millions of people believe they are obligated to file INFORMATION RETURNS (W-2s, 1099s and K-1s) on each other every January and February.  These government forms are intended for federal entities making federally connected payments.  Why do non-government "employers" use them?  Out of ignorance.  The moment your name appears on such a form, a [rebuttable] presumption arises that you have engaged in a federally connected taxable activity and made money from it.  Oops!  "Employers" and issuers of these forms don't realize that they are also making themselves out to be "federal" payers.  Thus the net is cast, trapping innocent fish of all kinds.



Hendrickson on Trial

On Monday, October 26th, a Michigan jury pronounced Pete Hendrickson guilty of tax evasion as a consequence of his "false reports" of zero or nominal income on tax returns filed between 2000 and 2006.  Not supplied to the jurors was the statutory law itself -- except by the judge himself, in his own interpretation:

Example of jury instructions: WAGES DEFINED: As it relates to the charges in this case, I instruct you that the term “wages” means all payments for services performed by an employee for his employer. The term wages applies to all employees and is not restricted to persons working for the government. 26 U.S.C. § 3401(a); 26 U.S.C. § 3121(a).

Read "Cracking the Code" to find out what "wages" really are -- a legal term that is very specific and should not be misunderstood when filling out one's 1040 return.  Pete discovered, by analyzing millions of words of code and law, what the government meant by certain words and has educated his readers accordingly.  At the trial, an Ogden, Utah IRS tax-rebuttal witness said that her office alone has seen some 10,000 returns filed in the manner of Hendrickson's, and went on to admit that not a single other person in America has been indicted for doing so.

The IRS itself had sent Pete several "no tax due" notices after adjusting his account per the tax returns he filed, but these admissions of "everything's cool" by the IRS were ignored by the prosecution, and the Hendricksons' many certificates of assessment issued by the IRS -- stating $0 due -- were never shown to the jury (see them here).

Why did they grab Pete?  In an attempt to finally and fully destroy the credibility and applicability of his ground-breaking book, "Cracking the Code," which was also not introduced as evidence during the trial.

Pete will appeal.  His sentencing will occur in February.  IRS refunds -- full refunds of annual withholdings -- have continued to roll in to CTC-educated filers from the time Pete was indicted nearly a year ago, and will probably continue to roll in hereafter.  Are you scared to read the book that scared the IRS?  Do so -- and find out what it's all about!

Read Pete's trial update here.



HE'S THE MAN ...

Pete Hendrickson

Beginning Tuesday, October 20th, Pete Hendrickson, author of the bestselling book "Cracking the Code: The Fascinating Truth About Taxation in America" stood trial at the Theodore Levin Courthouse before Judge Gerald Rosen and a Detroit, Michigan jury. Word of the trial did not reach most Americans -- even those who are aware of the so-called fraud of "income" tax.

The charge against Pete is that he didn't believe what he wrote on his tax returns filed between 2002 and 2007. This is a matter of philosophy -- did he or didn't he? If you were asked to answer that question, you would consider the decade Pete has spent researching the 6-plus million words of Internal Revenue Code and statutory law, the ground-breaking book he published about his findings, and the enormous website he has built and maintains, at which one can view the results of hundreds of individual filings made by those who have read Pete's book. What are these results? A total of more than ten million dollars to date in collective "victories" -- including complete annual refunds of wage withholdings and dismissals of 1099s. (And these are only the victories of those who have reported their successes back to Pete.)

The case against Pete was brought in November 2008 -- a last-ditch massive PR effort on the part of the IRS to blacken Pete's book and scare people off from reading it. If the writer himself is on trial ... Yet the proof in the pudding is that the whole time Pete has been preparing his defense, the IRS has continued to refund filers applying the liberating truth they are learning from Cracking the Code.Why is the income-tax community not up in arms about this trial? Why do we not even know about it? Possibly because the "real deal" in any of the issues whirling around us is given the least attention -- by deliberate design. Thesis, antithesis and synthesis.

Income tax. Most Americans believe it's unavoidable -- if you make money, you have to pay the government a portion of your earnings. Thesis: It's the law. Antithesis: Income tax is unlawful -- it's unconstitutional! Just don't file, just don't pay! The synthesis is what Pete Hendrickson's research brings us: Income tax is lawful, it's constitutional. It's just a very narrow, benign tax that doesn't apply to the money most people bring in. It's a federal excise tax, not a direct tax -- payable only on money that is federally connected. Why do most people end up paying tax on their "income"? Because of a fraudulent nationwide reporting system, whereby Americans use forms intended only for federally connected payments to advise the IRS of amounts they have paid to each other. The W-2 and 1099 "information returns" subject those whose names appear on them to a tax on their "income," as this word is a LEGAL TERM applying to money that comes from a federal nexus.

Pete's research discloses ways that Americans themselves can rectify the reports made about them, and the IRS accepts these corrections. Thus those employing what Pete calls "Congress's own method" of restitution are consistently succeeding in obtaining a RETURN of their withheld earnings -- which is the intended meaning of the "1040 U.S. Individual Income Tax Return."

It's a beautiful, liberating discovery. Explore this page to learn more. Read Cracking the Code to educate yourself. And for this gift to the American people, Pete Hendrickson is being put into the fire. He may be sentenced to a prison term if he is not able to convince the jury on the correctness and fairness of the law. The real law, the way it was originally and perfectly designed. Which design has been completely drowned out by the noise around the ill-defined thesis (we have to pay) and the equally ill-defined antithesis (we certainly do not).

Visit http://www.losthorizons.com/ to learn much, much more. Read Pete's newsletter here http://www.losthorizons.com/Newsletter.htm. Donate to Pete's enormous cost of legal defense, as he has had to hire the best and brightest to work with him. A victory in this trial could mean a turning point for you and every other American alive today.

Last Updated on Tuesday, 27 October 2009 21:54
 
What Is Slavery?

manaclesA wise person recently pointed out that if the government takes a portion of what you are paid for your labor, then the government owns [part of] your labor.  This makes you a slave.  The Consitution wanted nothing of the sort for the people of America.  If you obediently yield a portion of your earnings every year to the government's collection agency -- the IRS -- you are merely following an artful protocol set up in 1943 by the U.S. Treasury, which wanted to "borrow" a portion of every American's earnings each year to create revenue for the government's war effort.  The point of your "Individual Income Tax Return" which you file in April each year is to ask for the RETURN of your borrowed money.  (See Senate Subcommittee Hearings, August 21-22, 1942.)

Believe it or not, the perps themselves put out the incorrect notion each year that "income tax is unlawful" and "just don't pay."  It's not that simple, thanks to a very crafty major bamboozle pulled on Americans by the introduction of "reporting" methods made available to people who hired and worked for each other.  (Read our "Show Me the Law" section.)  Activists like to beat a drum once they hear a rhythm they like.  "Income tax is unlawful" is a drumbeat that will get you into trouble ... for income tax is lawful -- it just doesn't apply to most people in this country, given the kind of work they are doing.  Find out why and how by reading the rest of this section!

Last Updated on Monday, 31 August 2009 17:33
 
Huge Victory!

 Wouldn't you love to get a notice from the IRS that someday says, "We Changed Your Account - This Is Not a Bill," with the admission that you were right and they are wrong.  With the admission that what they have tried to take from you by a very misleading and devious nationwide protocol is now being returned to you or dropped altogether.

WOULDN'T YOU LOVE TO EDUCATE AN IRS AGENT AS TO THE LAW??

Do you realize that the people who are putting the screws to this country are NOT THE IRS AGENTS, but those behind what is essentially a collection agency for the private Federal Reserve ... and the "Fed," as they call it, is NOT PART OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT at all.  Its knucklebuster agency, the IRS, is a "revenue" service that attempts to suck a [large] percentage of individual Americans' earnings every year, to feed the ever-growing interest on the national debt (read: enslavement) to a massively powerful foreign and private cartel of banks.

Here's the beginning of an inspiring story from Pete Hendrickson: "In September of 2006, Bruce G. [of Arizona] was being dunned by the IRS for more than $6 million."  It ends like this: "In October 2008, Bruce won his first victories for the rule of law -- concrete IRS acknowledgements that Bruce had no tax liaility ... simply because his unprivileged, non-federally-connected gains don't qualify as 'income.'"

And that's how elemental it is, folks!  Daytrader Bruce G. of Arizona turned out not liable for "income" tax on the sums of $$ passing through his account and successfully presented a defense that even his receipts from these trades were not taxable.  (See Bruce's exchange with the IRS here.)  "What's 'income'?" is the question we have forgotten all about asking.

Read on!

Last Updated on Friday, 09 January 2009 09:31
 
Two Kinds of Returns

Image The 1040 is a return you file about yourself.  W-2s and 1099s are "information returns" filed about you by others.

The whole game of tax (not unlike the game of tag) is about these returns.  Each year, the clock ticks until April 15th as the IRS waits for you to answer the legal "charges" made about you by way of the information returns people have sent to them about you (if any at all have been filed).  Tick-tock, tick-tock.

Image
On April 15th, the bell goes DING!

If, by April 15th of each year, you have not "answered" the "charges" filed about you by others, the IRS will find you at fault.  It's that simple, according to an amazing book written by Pete Hendrickson, titled "Cracking the Code: The Fascinating Truth About Taxation in America."  You have several choices.  You can, by way of your 1040 personal return, agree with the information filed about you, or you can disagree.  The nature of this information is that you were the recipient of "income" obtained as an exercise of federal privilege.  In plain English, did your $$ come from investing in or conducting federal activities, or as direct federal benefits??

 The 1040 Income Tax Return as a Legal Claim for Refund

In a 1942 Senate subcommittee hearing on the proposed Revenue Act, Senator John Danaher asked for clarification of the concept of withholding pay from both "taxpayers" and "non-taxpayers."  (It was known that "non-taxpayers" were those who did not receive "income" from a federal nexus.)  Danaher wanted to know how individuals who were not classified as "taxpayers" would be able to get an annual refund of earnings being withheld by the government under the new plan.  Milton Friedman of the Treasury Department replied:  "An individual will file an income tax return, and that income tax return will constitute an automatic claim for refund."

What does this mean?  Well, for starters, with World War II going on, the government wanted good Americans to support its expenditures.  The idea of taking a portion of everyone's income -- imposing a "broad income tax" -- would create a much bigger flow of revenue.  While citizens could ask for the return of these withholdings at the end of each year, it was hoped that most would not, and that if enough time passed, Americans would come to assume that paying a tax to the government based on one's yearly earnings was just a reality of life.

For those who were savvy enough to recognize that the government was not entitled to keep their withholdings, the 1040 U.S. Individual Income Tax Return was provided as a legal way to request a refund, however big or small this refund might be.  Very few people today are aware of the true purpose of the 1040 return.

To see a bonafide transcript of the Senate exchange, click here.

Last Updated on Tuesday, 30 December 2008 09:42
 
"CRACKING THE CODE: The Fascinating Truth About Taxation in America" by Pete Hendrickson

Image This book will gently but effectively usher you into a whole new universe.

Most people in the "tax defying" community (as it is now officially called) are incompletely informed.  They believe the income tax is unconstitutional, but they can't legally prove why.  We have author Pete Hendrickson to thank for doing a bit of research (reading millions of words of Internal Revenue Code and statutory law!) for us.  It appears that Congress itself, although not opposed to writing a horrendously convoluted and misleading tax code, has provided ways for law-abiding citizens to disengage themselves yearly from the very uncomfortable noose of "income" tax, but it requires a little knowledge and a LOT of unconditioning to do so.

You will no longer need accountants or "certified tax preparers" to take care of this ugly little annual task for you.  You will breathe freely and happily once you have gotten the picture and taken your first hesitant steps into freedom.  The concept of "Cracking the Code" is not based on "a little loophole."  It is not "just another trick" you can try on the IRS to get out of paying taxes.  It is an explanation of the true nature of "income" tax and the true purpose of filing a 1040 return.

Below is a story for you to read, followed by ten facts to absorb and share with others.

Last Updated on Friday, 12 December 2008 11:49
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 Next > End >>

Page 1 of 3