CIT's newest video is getting a ton of attention ... but major 9/11 websites make no report of it.  Why?

We finally have the Pentagon evidence tightly and succinctly laid out, in fatal conflict with the government's story, and nobody wants to talk about it.  Makes you wonder!

Look at the picture above.  You see two plane approaches -- one reported by the government and the other reported by independent witnesses.  Here you have the witnesses' own drawings of the plane's trajectory (see yellow lines).  The little white circles in the red flight path (south side of the Citgo gas station) are the famous "downed light poles," which were official "proof" that Flight 77 struck the Pentagon.  Yet the independent witnesses reported seeing a plane come in from the north side of the Citgo station, and some said it then "pulled up."  Look at the north side approach -- it misses the light poles altogether.

What did the white plane do ...?  "Pulling up" means it passed over the building, just as a big fireball and explosion went off at the Pentagon itself.  (Watch CIT's "North Side Flyover" DVD for the full witness interviews.)  What happened to the real American Airlines Flight 77?  No one knows.  It was lost from radar as early as 8:56.  Could the white plane that witnesses saw have been Flight 77?  No.  American Airlines planes are silver; witnesses reported seeing a white or off-white plane.  Did anything hit the Pentagon?  See CIT's new website www.CitizenInvestigationTeam.com for the the best information collected to date on 9/11 and the Pentagon.

The official story tells us that a Boeing 757 (allegedly American Airlines Flight 77) swooped in from south side of the [former] Citgo gas station and knocked down five light poles before hitting the west side of the Pentagon.  (Interestingly, this was where an investigation into the $2.3 trillion missing from the Pentagon's coffers was taking place, and it also happened to be a region of the building that was undergoing renovation.)  But 13 independent witnesses unanimously say they saw a plane coming in from the north side of the gas station.  The famous "downed light poles" cited by authorities as proof that a plane struck the building are in line with the south-side path, as was all the "physical damage" we were shown.  Questions remain ... Why is there no damage to the Pentagon's lawn, and why do witnesses insist that the plane they saw was on the north side?

Watch "The Pentacon" and "The North Side Flyover" videos by CIT, featuring witnesses describing a plane coming in from the north.

Witnesses were from the nearby CITGO gas station and from Arlington National Cemetery.  These men have nothing to gain by contradicting the official story.  In fact, those who differ with the official "facts" of 9/11 only put themselves at risk, especially when they are federal employees.  So why would these men tell a different story, and what does it mean?

(Read full report on CIT website.)

The plot gets weirder.  Here is an elderly black taxicab driver who claims his Lincoln Town Car was struck by one of the falling light poles as the Boeing 757 headed for the famous Pentagon strike.  (Remember, this is nowhere near where 13 witnesses place the plane.)  Lloyde England was interviewed extensively by the media on national TV and considered a hero of 9/11.  (His wife, interestingly, works for the FBI.)  The story is that Lloyde's car was headed south on Washington Boulevard, traveling at 40 miles per hour when it was hit.  He slammed on his brakes, coming to a skidding stop on the side of the road.



Lloyde claims the streetlight was sticking out of his car when he stopped.  His story is that a silent stranger came over to help him pull the enormous metal pole out of it.  Amazingly, there is not a SCRATCH on the hood of Lloyde's car, and nor did the light pole mar the upholstery, as shown by the photos below.  A pole like this is about 40 feet tall and weighs some 250 pounds.  What gives, Lloyde, if not your car?

Click to enlarge the photos below to get a good look at Lloyde's taxi, which is considered by authorities to be invaluable evidence of American Airlines Flight 77's deadly descent on the Pentagon.

Watch this 9-minute YouTube video from CIT that got 20,000 hits over a single weekend ...  Here, the Pentagon cab driver admits the whole event was planned and he was "a small man ... in it."   (For the full interviews, watch the DVD "Lloyde England and his Taxicab: The Eye of the Storm")

Adobe Flash Player not installed or older than 9.0.115!

Ah, yes.  The argument posed by some is that the Boeing disintegrated (variation: "vaporized") when it hit the Pentagon.  However, there was a big hole in the Pentagon, so SOMETHING must have caused that hole, as big 16-foot holes don't appear in concrete by themselves.

Do you like math?  If so, there's a basic calculation for what would have happened to the Boeing if it did indeed descend, as the official story holds, upon the Pentagon and crashed right into it.  Ever heard of "G" force?  The g-force of an object is its acceleration relative to free-fall.  (Wikipedia)  If you do the math, using the officially "professed" speed of the Boeing, its mass, its location, and the way it turned ... the effect of G force(s) would have yielded a virtual weight of about 8.5 million pounds for Flight 77, which alone would have caused it to disintegrate BEFORE striking the Pentagon.

So what made that hole??  Here's the math on the "crash" ... http://www.twf.org/News/Y2009/0702-Flight77.html