9/11 COULD have been a controlled demolition. But I find that most of your evidence is easily trumped. You claim that the towers were taken down by other explosions (aside from the plane crash) because you can see jets of smoke coming out of the tower during collapse. I figure that this must be caused by compression from the top half of the tower falling into the lower half, and that most of the smoke is coming out of the open windows (possibly the ones people jumped out of) or structural weaknesses. Now some people seem to think that a plane isn't enough to bring down a building. Think about it: (1) The tower must have had some combustible materials inside of it. (2) The flames from the plane plus said materials could have melted the metal structure inside the building, weakening it. Now for that camera shake: I don't know where you got that footage from but I assume that around the camera there must have been some commotion. You know, when two towers get hit by airplanes, it's bound to raise some awareness (and panic). I think I only see two sets of explosions in your video: (1) Explosions caused by planes. (2) Explosions caused by flammable materials inside the building. These being the only explosions that display any sort of fire. The smoke explosions I think are just caused by compression and stress.
Now, I'm not saying you shouldn't consider the possibility of these things. I just think you should study this A LOT becore printing T-shirts and starting websites. I mean, your certainly allowed to do this. It's in the constitution. I just find that our government was created to protect us from these things and keep things like 9/11 from happening, not to put us in direct danger. People are jealous of our country. That's why they try to attack us. Conspiring against our government isn't going to help protect us from that. -- Zak, 17
|
|
Last Updated on Friday, 03 April 2009 18:55 |
|
|
|
